On April 28, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced an award of $18 million dollars to a whistleblower for providing the SEC with crucial information that was used as part of an enforcement action against a firm found to be in violation of federal securities laws.
Prior to the SEC’s involvement, the whistleblower repeatedly attempted to bring the issue to the attention of the Firm’s senior management. The crucial information provided by the whistleblower prompted an examination of the firm, which in turn led to the enforcement action resulting in the recovery of millions of dollars of losses for investors and once again demonstrating the efficacy of the SEC’s Whistleblower Program. Per the SEC’s order, the Claims Review Staff (“CRS”) also made a recommendation to deny an award to three other claimants who submitted a claim in conjunction with the enforcement action.
Background: the SEC’s Whistleblower Program
Since 2012, the SEC has awarded over $448 million to 81 whistleblowers for bringing crucial information to the attention of the SEC and assisting with identifying securities laws violations that have resulted in the recovery of millions of dollars of losses for investors.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, whistleblowers are eligible for awards based on the significance of their information and can be awarded up to 10-30% of sanctions against firms that exceed $1 million. All monies awarded to whistleblowers are distributed from a fund comprised of fines levied against firms found to have violated federal securities laws, and are not taken from investors funds recovered by the SEC.
Additionally, in 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that employees who claim whistleblower protections under the Dodd-Frank Act must bring their claims directly to the SEC in order to receive job protections from employers who might choose to terminate the employee in retaliation. By obligating the employee to report malfeasance directly to the SEC and bypass the employer, the Supreme Court’s decision created a stronger likelihood that more employees would seek to bypass senior management and go directly to the SEC with complaints.
What Should I Look for When Evaluating Whistleblower Policies and Procedures?
As with all policies and procedures (“P&Ps”), it is important for firms to continue to test the effectiveness of their whistleblower programs, especially considering the Supreme Court’s decision.
Chief Compliance Officers (“CCOs”) should review their whistleblower programs at least annually to ensure that they offer protections to employees who report malfeasance and that the anonymity of the employees will remain intact. This should include a review of the delivery system for reporting wrongdoing (e.g. employee hotline, online portal, etc.) to ensure its security so the employee can maintain confidence their privacy will be respected.
It is also important for CCOs to include their whistleblower programs as part of their annual training so that their employees understand how the reporting process works; reinforce that employee anonymity will be upheld; and, impress upon the employees the importance of acting ethically to ensure that any wrongdoing should be brought to the attention of the CCO and other senior managers.
How Can You Help Me with My Whistleblower Policies and Procedures?
Jacko Law Group can help your firm with evaluating and revising your whistleblower P&Ps to ensure that your firm’s whistleblower program is up-to-date and supports the efforts of employees who bring violations of federal securities laws to the attention of the CCO. Whistleblower programs should be reviewed at least annually, and our team of attorneys will use our extensive experience to ask detailed questions designed to determine if your whistleblower program is thorough, accurate, and up-to-date.
Add a comment
- New SEC Climate Change and ESG Task Force to Enhance Investor Protection by Red Flagging Examples of Corporate Greenwashing
- What Investment Advisers Must do to Qualify for the DOL’s Prohibited Transaction Exemption for IRA Rollovers
- SEC Division of Examinations Cites Enhanced Focus on Business Continuity Processes, Protection of Retail Investors and ESG-Related Risks Among its 2021 Priorities
- FINRA Report Suggests Growing Need for Enhanced Risk Management in Cybersecurity and Outside Business Activities
- Deadline Approaching: Considerations for Your Form ADV
- Leveraging JLG's Latest Service: Real Estate
- Safeguarding Your Firm Against Fraudulent or Improper Recognition of Revenue
- New Advisers Act Advertising Rule to Undergo Further Review
- Investors, Advisers Must be Mindful to Comply with New U.S. Ban on Estimated $1 Trillion of Chinese Securities
- Your First Meeting on the SEC’s New Investment Adviser Marketing Rule Should Address These Topics
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Investment Advisers
- Regulatory Examinations
- Policies and Procedures
- Social Media Marketing
- Due Diligence
- Transition Services
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Aging Clients
- Advisers Act
- Virtual Currency
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Ponzi Scheme
- Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE)
- Broker Protocol
- Securities Law
- Form U5
- Private Equity
- Private Funds
- Hedge Funds
- Regulation Best Interest
- Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
- Government Shutdown
- Risk Alert
- Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- Investment Company Act
- Rule 6c
- Wells Fargo