When it comes to disclosure, it’s important to have more than one set of eyes review everything from marketing materials to Forms ADV to make certain all required language is included and nothing is overlooked. A recent regulatory filing underscores how a lack of disclosure and not having sufficient written policies and procedures in place to prevent such lapses can create unnecessary conflicts of interest, regardless of adviser intent.
On May 12, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney (“MSSB”) agreed to settle charges that it provided misleading information regarding transaction costs and services to retail clients in its wrap program for the period from 2012 to 2017.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has spent time and energy focused on proxy voting matters in the recent months. In August 2019, the SEC provided guidance (discussed below) to assist investment advisers fulfilling their proxy voting responsibilities. It also appears to have increased its attention toward regulatory actions involving proxy voting on behalf of clients.
Michelle L. Jacko and Tina Mitchell wrote the article titled Editorial Advisors Corner: Risk Management Update April 2015 – Regulatory Pitfalls Regarding Fee Based Accounts which was published in the Wolters Kluwer Newsletter in July/August, 2015. … Read More
Michelle L. Jacko wrote the article titled The Changing Landscape of Disclosure: Proposed Changes to Form ADV Part 2 which was published in the National Society of Compliance Professionals (NSCP) Currents’ May/June 2008 publication. … Read More