The rule requires SEC registered investment advisers (“RIAs”) to annually review “the adequacy of the policies and procedures established pursuant to this section and the effectiveness of their implementation.”[i]
Annual reviews have been cited by the Office of Compliance Inspections & Examinations (“OCIE”) as one of the top five (5) “most frequent compliance topics” during SEC exams.
Among their observations, OCIE has found that RIAs have failed to perform annual reviews outright; sufficiently reviewed and tested the adequacy of their policies and procedures (“P&Ps”); and, failed to implement changes or make updates to their P&Ps based on their annual reviews. [ii]
In fact, the SEC has brought enforcement actions against RIAs that failed to conduct annual reviews, including cease-and-desist orders, censure, and civil-monetary penalties, such as the case of Hudson Housing Capital, LLC, wherein the adviser failed to both implement and review their P&Ps as required by the Compliance Rule.[iii]
In consideration of the importance of the Compliance Rule’s requirement for conducting an annual review of your P&Ps, we believe RIAs should evaluate their Code of Ethics when conducting their annual reviews.
Code of Ethics
Rule 204A-1 of the Advisers Act requires RIAs to maintain a Code of Ethics (“COE”) reasonably designed to ensure that the business conduct of RIA personnel is commensurate with federal securities laws and to prevent misconduct on the part of the RIA; set requirements for employees to comply with federal securities laws; administer certain reporting requirements; require employees to receive and acknowledge a copy of the COE and any amendments; and, require employees to report violations of the COE to the RIA’s CCO as soon as possible.[iv]
Among other things, RIAs should review and test (1) when COE acknowledgements are received; (2) if any personal trading activity by access persons has violated the COE or disadvantaged any clients; (3) if the firm has received any material non-public information (“MNPI”), and if proper restrictions were placed on personal trading activity and client trades when the firm was in receipt of such information; (4) if gifts and business entertainment were documented and if any violations of de minimis amounts were made; and, (5) if any employees have made charitable or political contributions and verifying that those contributions have been made commensurate with the firm’s COE and state and federal securities laws.
Your firm’s COE and its administration are bound to be highly scrutinized by the SEC during an exam and since this is one of the most sensitive areas of a firm’s P&Ps, it is important to prioritize it during an annual review.
As you can see there are several of areas of your RIA’s compliance program that need to be taken into consideration when conducting an annual review.
While the task of testing all of the different areas of your firm, analyzing your results, and recording findings and recommendations based on your review might seem difficult, it is not insurmountable. Good planning, working with stakeholders and key employees, and employing a strategic approach to testing your P&Ps will allow you to approach your annual review with confidence.
Jacko Law Group can help your firm with your annual reviews, including providing guidance on how to conduct an annual review, assisting with testing different areas of your compliance program, or conducting the annual review in its entirety on behalf of your firm.
Our team of attorneys will use our extensive experience to assist you with your annual review in order to ensure the successful fulfillment of your annual review obligation under the Compliance Rule.
Be on the lookout for our next topic in the series, custody.
[ii] Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations. “Risk Alert: The Five Most Frequent Compliance Topics Identified in OCIE Examinations of Investment Advisers.” SEC.Gov, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 7 Feb. 2017, www.sec.gov/ocie/Article/risk-alert-5-most-frequent-ia-compliance-topics.pdf.
- Jr. Partner
Jennifer Trowbridge, Esq. serves as Jr. Partner at Jacko Law Group, PC (“JLG”) where she provides corporate and regulatory counsel to clients with diverse business models and various backgrounds. Within her practice, Ms ...
Add a comment
- Starting Out: Mergers & Acquisitions – Term Sheets and Due Diligence
- Four P Words to Remember During the Breakaway and Transition Process
- Proactive Risk Mitigation
- How a Popular Index’s Lack of Risk Disclosures Resulted in a Recent $9 Million SEC Fine: Lessons Learned
- The Importance of Having a Successful Succession Plan
- Why Advisors Should Seek Specialized Counsel When Making a Business Transition
- Protecting Your Firm Through Risk Management
- A Financial Advisory Firm’s Simple, but Costly Lesson in the Need for Adequate Fee Disclosure
- Five Investor Protections to Remember When Finalizing FINRA Pre-dispute Arbitration Agreements
- Compliance Steps Fiduciaries Should Take Now to Help Ensure Continued Adherence with the DOL’s New ERISA Exemption
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Transition Services
- Investment Advisers
- Policies and Procedures
- Due Diligence
- Regulatory Examinations
- Social Media Marketing
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Aging Clients
- Advisers Act
- Virtual Currency
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Ponzi Scheme
- Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE)
- Securities Law
- Broker Protocol
- Form U5
- Private Equity
- Private Funds
- Hedge Funds
- Regulation Best Interest
- Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
- Government Shutdown
- Risk Alert
- Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- Investment Company Act
- Rule 6c
- Wells Fargo