M. Jacko
Managing Partner and CEO

Michelle L. Jacko, Esq.

Managing Partner and CEO

Michelle L. Jacko, Esq. is the Managing Partner and CEO of Jacko Law Group, PC (“JLG”), which offers securities, corporate, real estate, and employment law counsel to broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies, hedge/private funds and financial industry professionals. In addition, Ms. Jacko is the Founder and CEO of Core Compliance & Legal Services, Inc., a compliance consultation firm.

Ms. Jacko specializes in investment adviser, broker-dealer, investment company and private fund regulatory compliance matters, internal control development, regulatory examinations, transition services, and operational risk management. Her consultation practice is focused on the areas of regulatory exams and formal inquiries, investment and merger and acquisition transactions, exit and succession planning, annual reviews, policies and procedures development, testing of compliance programs (including evaluation of internal controls and supervision), mock exams, senior client issues, cybersecurity, Regulation S-P, and much more.

Over the years and through a transformative market, Ms. Jacko has also developed service solutions throughout her practice, focusing on regulatory, compliance, commercial and corporate strategic solutions for the financial industry. Her practice focuses on formations and registration of broker-dealers, investment advisers and funds and platforms associated with each of these business models.  She focuses on transition and succession planning for companies, spearheading Jacko Law Group’s mergers and acquisitions practice area. She aligns her legal team to directly apply experienced legal acumen and business-savvy foresight to assist clients navigate and traverse the breakaway, formation, and growth plan for their corporation’s continued achievement, expansion, and upward trajectory.

Throughout this process, Ms. Jacko uses her 27 years of regulatory compliance experience to provide risk mitigation strategies to businesses.  She provides her clients with risk assessments, annual reviews and gap analysis, and serves as lead attorney for SEC and FINRA enforcement matters, regulatory formal inquiries, and regulatory examinations.  She has developed a practice that successfully helps our clients to be prepared for examinations through meticulous preparations, including mock interviews, compliance program document reviews, and counsel to members of senior management and interfacing with regulators throughout the process.   She frequently provides counsel on Chief Compliance Officer liability issues, assists advisors with regulatory reporting of disciplinary events and customer complaints, provides counsel on various representative onboarding and exit considerations and drafts complex agreements and client disclosure documents.

Utilizing an unparalleled service with a visionary strategy, Ms. Jacko’s counsel contributes to client success. She fosters trust amongst her team and has forged a path for JLG’s growing and multifaceted merger and acquisition practice, general corporate counsel services and regulatory compliance practice areas.

As a frequent presenter at national financial industry conferences, Ms. Jacko delivers insightful and thought-provoking workshops regarding industry hot topics and rising compliance issues. She is a frequent contributor to various industry journals and publications, including Barron’s Advisor, Charles Schwab, Investment Adviser Association’s IAA Today, National Society of Compliance Professionals’ CurrentsLawyer Monthly MagazineThomson Reuters, and more.  She also is a featured author in Modern Compliance, Vol. 1 and 2.

Ms. Jacko served as the former Vice-Chair of Education of the Corporations Committee for the State Bar of California Business Law Section and is a two-time Board member alumn of the National Society of Compliance Professionals. She is the Co-Founder and a member of the Southern California Compliance Group and also is a FINRA Arbitrator. Ms. Jacko is a member of Vistage International and actively participates in her community.

JLG and Ms. Jacko are proud to be members of the National Women Business Owners (NABWO) Corporation.

Throughout her career, Ms. Jacko has established herself as an influential leader, both locally and industry-wide. She has received numerous accolades and recognitions for her contributions, impact, and thought leadership. Since 2019, she has been selected as a finalist for San Diego Business Journal’s (SDBJ) CEO of the Year Award (2019-2022). She has also been selected for inclusion for the SDBJ’s 2022 Women of Influence 50 over 50, 2021 -2022 Women of Influence in Law SDBJ’s 2018-2022 Business Woman of the Year, 2020-2022 San Diego 500 Influential Business Leaders Award, 2020-2022 SD500, and prestigious 2020 Most Admired CEO Awards. Alongside the many awards from the SDBJ, Ms. Jacko  also was selected as a finalist for San Diego Magazine’s 2020–2021 Influential Women: Woman of the Year Award and was honored as a finalist for the 2019 NAWBO Bravo Awards - San Diego. International magazine CEO Today also selected Ms. Jacko as one of the 2019 and 2020 Business Women of the Year Awards. She also received Acquisition International magazine's Global Excellence Awards: Most Influential Woman in Securities Law 2019–2020 - San Diego, and locally was selected by San Diego Metro as one of the 12 Women of Influence in San Diego, CA.

Before starting both companies, Ms. Jacko previously served as Of Counsel at Shustak & Partners, PC. Prior to that, she was Vice President of Compliance and Branch Manager of the Home Office Supervision team at LPL Financial Services, Corporation (Linsco/Private Ledger). She also served as Legal Counsel of Investments and Chief Compliance Officer at First American Trust, FSB and held the position of Compliance Manager at Nicholas-Applegate Capital Management. In addition, Ms. Jacko was with PIM Financial Services, Inc., and Speiser, Krause, Madole & Mendelsohn, Jackson.

Ms. Jacko received her J.D. from St. Mary’s University School of Law and B.A., International Relations, from the University of San Diego. She is admitted to the State Bar of California and United States District Court, Southern District of California. Michelle holds NSCP’s Certified Securities Compliance Professional (CSCP) designation and is a member of the National Association of Women Lawyers (NAWL).

In addition to her many accomplishments, Ms. Jacko is also dedicated to giving back to her community and charitable organizations. Throughout the years she has dedicated her time and efforts to numerous organizations, including the Autism Tree Project, Wounded Warriors Project, the ASCPA, the San Diego Food Bank, School of the Madeleine and more. She also supports whenever she can the military community.  It is her dedication to her team, her practice and her community that has laid the foundation for JLG’s impact and continued growth and success.

Read less
Practices :
Mergers & AcquisttionsPrivate Equity & Private Fund ServicesSEC/State: Regulatory Compliance Services
How The Proposed Amendments To Form ADV And Advisers Act Will Impact Investment Advisers
Form ADV & Disclosure Documents Legal Risk Management Tips
May 1, 2015

The Form ADV is one of the most important documents compiled by an investment adviser. Not only does it serve as the adviser’s client disclosure brochure to unveil important information related to the firm’s products and service offerings, fees, business practices and related conflicts of interest, but it also serves as a critical tool for the SEC’s regulatory program for measuring and analyzing risk for its registrants.

On May 20, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) issued Release No. IA-4091 (the “Release”), which proposes certain amendments to Form ADV in order to obtain additional data related to an adviser’s business practices in three broad areas: obtaining information related to separately managed accounts (“SMAs”); streamlining reporting obligations for related advisers to multiple private funds; and amendments clarifying the reporting obligations intended for Form ADV Part 1.1

In addition, the Release also seeks to amend the Investment Advisers Act of 19402 to include new provisions relating to rule 204-2, the books and records rule,which would require registrants to maintain certain performance backup documentation for and written communications relating to performance information presented and circulated by the adviser. With these heightened requirements, it is the Commission’s intent to help deter fraudulent performance claims, thereby offering better protections for investors.

This month’s Legal Tip highlights some of the most important aspects of the proposed amendments and provides guidance on what comments the Commission seeks.

Proposed Amendments to Form ADV

In an effort to gather more meaningful data to help investors assess an investment adviser and the Commission to monitor industry trends and conduct risk analytics, the SEC is proposing amendments to the following areas.

A. New Information Requests for SMAs

Several of the proposed amendments relate directly to SMAs. For purposes of this amendment, the SEC defines an SMA as “advisory accounts other than those that are pooled investment vehicles.”New information required to be reported would include:

  • Types of SMA assets held;
  • Data on SMA regulatory assets under management and the types of accounts5 that comprise those assets;
  • Use of derivatives and borrowings in SMAs; and
  • Information relating to those custodians who custody over 10% of the adviser’s SMA business.

Notably, dependent upon the response provided by the adviser, there could be differing reporting obligations based upon, for example, the regulatory assets under management reported.The SEC is seeking comments on reporting frequency (i.e., more than on an annual basis) and the thresholds proposed for such reporting.

B. Additional Information Relating to the Investment Adviser and Its Business

The SEC also is proposing to expand its reporting questions within Form ADV Part 1 to include questions related to an adviser’s identification, business and affiliations. This includes the following:

  • Providing all Central Index Key (“CIK”) numbers if there is more than one;
  • Reporting all social media platform websites7 currently in use by the adviser;
  • Additional information relating to offices other than the adviser’s principal office;8
  • Whether the Chief Compliance Officer is associated with or compensated by someone other than the adviser;9
  • Reporting company assets within a range;
  • Expanding Item 5 to include new client information relating to number of clients and amount of regulatory assets under management for each category of client;
  • Reporting on the number of clients where the registrant performed an advisory activity but does not have regulatory assets under management;
  • Notating if regulatory assets under management reported on Form ADV Part 1A differs from the client assets under management reported on Form ADV Part 2A;
  • Reporting regulatory assets under management attributable to non-U.S. clients;
  • Providing the regulatory assets under management for each managed account related to an investment company or business development company advised by the registrant; and
  • Reporting the regulatory assets under management attributable to the adviser serving as a portfolio manager or sponsor to a wrap fee program.

Additional information also is being sought related to the identifying numbers of an adviser’s financial industry affiliations and service providers, such as Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) registration numbers and CIK numbers as well as the percentage of private fund clients who are qualified clients.10

The SEC is seeking comments on the usefulness of such data to investors and the concerns of and burden placed on advisers for providing this information.

C. Availability of Umbrella Registration for Certain Private Fund Advisers

Through amendment of the filing requirements for private fund advisers who are controlled by or under common control with a primary filing adviser, the SEC intends to streamline the reporting process by using an “umbrella registration” technique wherein there would be only one registration filing required for the advisory business. In order to qualify for the umbrella registration, a series of conditions must be met. This includes:

  • The filing adviser and each relying adviser must only advise private funds and clients in SMAs that are qualified clients;
  • The filing adviser must have its principal office in the U.S., thus subjecting the filing adviser and each relying adviser to the provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;
  • The relying adviser must be associated with and supervised by the filing adviser;
  • The relying adviser is subject to SEC examinations; and
  • The filing adviser and each relying adviser operates under a single code of ethics11 and written policies and procedures manual.12

In addition, as proposed, Form ADV Part 1A would include new identifying information related to the relying adviser, including the relying adviser’s address, CRD and other unique identifier numbers, basis for SEC registration and ownership information.

The SEC is seeking comments on the usefulness of umbrella registration and whether the Commission should amend Form ADV to accommodate for such umbrella registration.

D. Clarifying Amendments to Form ADV Part 1A

Finally, there are a number of proposed amendments to Form ADV Part 1A that are designed to clarify the type of data sought by the Commission for advisory filings. This includes:

  • Item 2 – specifying SEC registration eligibility for “newly formed advisers”;
  • Item 4 – succession by amendment filings;
  • Item 7 – information about financial industry affiliations and advisement to private funds;
  • Item 8 – clarifying the types of participation and interest the adviser expects to engage in during the year;
  • Section 9.C. of Schedule D – information about independent public accountants that perform surprise examinations in connection with the custody rule; and
  • Disclosure Reporting Pages – relating to disciplinary reporting for both registered and exempt reporting advisers.

For more information, including proposed changes to the instructions and glossary related to these areas, please refer to pages 35-44 of the Release.

Proposed Amendments to the Books and Records Rules – Maintenance of Performance Information

Many investment advisers have enacted internal controls whereby the firm routinely maintains backup records to support performance numbers presented within their marketing collateral. The Commission is now proposing amendments to rule 204-2 requiring mandatory maintenance of all materials “that demonstrate the calculation of the performance or rate of return in any communication that the adviser circulates or distributes, directly or indirectly, to any person.”13 This means that supporting materials to performance claims communicated to just one person would need to be maintained.

Moreover, under the proposal, advisers also would be required to maintain originals of all written communications sent or received by the adviser relating to performance or rate of return of any or all managed accounts or securities recommendations.14 Given the fact that performance advertising continues to be an area where the Commission continues to find deficiencies during its examinations, it appears to be the staff’s hope that requiring this additional information will help to mitigate against misleading advertising claims.


Based on our clients’ business models, many of these proposals will have a material impact on their compliance programs. Consequently, investment advisers are strongly encouraged to review the Release and consider submitting comments related to these proposed changes, taking into consideration the types and amount of information that will be required to be reported.

Comments to the proposed rules can be submitted via form, by sending an email to rule- comments@sec.gov or by accessing the Federal eRulemaking Portal online. Comments must be submitted no later than 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. For more information on submitted comments to the proposed rules, see https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2015/ia-4091.pdf.

For more information on the proposed rule changes and to evaluate how they may impact your advisory firm, please contact us at (619) 298-2880 or at info@jackolg.com

Author: Michelle L. Jacko, Esq., Managing Partner, Jacko Law Group, PC. JLG works extensively with investment advisers, broker-dealers, investment companies, hedge funds, banks and corporate clients on securities and corporate counsel matters.

This article is for information purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting with a lawyer.

See https://www.sec.gov/about/forms/formadv-part1a.pdf.

See https://www.sec.gov/about/laws/iaa40.pdf.

See https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/275.204-2.

4 A pooled investment vehicle would include registered investment companies, business development companies and pooled investment vehicles that are not investment companies, such as private funds.

5 Among other things, collection of this data could help in better understanding whether an adviser specializes in particular asset classes.

6 For example, advisers with at least $10 billion in regulatory assets under management reported for SMAs would have to update certain data on Form ADV Part 1A on both a mid-year and year-end basis. For more information, see page 10 of the Release.

7 Social media platforms include, for example, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

8 Information collected would include the total number of offices and information about the 25 largest offices based on number of employees. These largest offices would provide additional information on the office’s CRD branch number, number of employees performing advisory functions and business activities conducted from that office.

For more information, see page 18 of the Release.

9 Among other things, this data could be useful in helping to identify outsourced chief compliance officers for purposes of assessing potential risks.

10 A “qualified client” is defined in rule 205-3 as a natural person who or a company that (1) immediately after entering into the contract, has at least $1,000,000 under the management of the investment adviser; (2) the investment adviser entering into the contract (and any person acting on his behalf) reasonably believes, immediately prior to entering into the contract, either: (a) has a net worth (together, in the case of a natural person, with assets held jointly with a spouse) of more than $2,000,000 at the time the contract is entered into; or (b) is a qualified purchaser as defined in section 2(a)(51)(A) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 at the time the contract is entered into; or (3) a natural person who immediately prior to entering into the contract is: (a) an executive officer, director, trustee, general partner, or person serving in a similar capacity, of the investment adviser; or (b) an employee of the investment adviser (other than an employee performing solely clerical, secretarial or administrative functions with regard to the investment adviser) who, in connection with his or her regular functions or duties, participates in the investment activities of such investment adviser, provided that such employee has been performing such functions and duties for or on behalf of the investment adviser, or substantially similar functions or duties for or on behalf of another company for at least 12 months.

11 For more information, see rule 204A-1.

12 For more information, see rule 206(4)-7.

13 See page 45 of the Release.

14 Id.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *