Attorneys for Samuel E. Wyly ("Sam Wyly") and his late brother Charles J. Wyly ("Charles Wyly") (jointly, the "Wylys") presented arguments to a U.S. District Judge disputing the amount the Wylys are being ordered to pay for their role in a fraudulent offshore operation. The Securities and Exchange Commission("SEC") has requested $729 million in damages from the Wylys related to " a 13-year fraudulent scheme to hold and trade tens of millions of securities of public companies while they were members of the boards of directors of those companies, without disclosing their ownership and their trading of those securities." The fraudulent activity used a system of trusts in the Isle of Man and the Cayman Islands to hide their ownership and control of the Issuers' securities.
The Wylys attorney, Harry Susman ("Susman"), argued that the penalty would bankrupt the Wylys, whose combined net worth is $119 million. The penalty is made up of a $51 million civil penalty and up to $678 million disgorgement. Susman stated that " the demand was excessively punitive and unsupported by the law." The SEC initially sought $1.4 billion in disgorgement.
Bridget Fitzpatrick ("Fitzpatrick"), a lawyer for the SEC, contends that the penalty is fair considering the $553 million in profits the Wylys gained as a result of the scheme. The damages the SEC is seeking are equivalent to unpaid taxes due to the Internal Revenue Service. Susman argues that the SEC " should be barred from doing so because federal law only permits the IRS to assess tax penalties." Fitzpatrick responded by saying they are not seeking to recover the tax penalty, but rather, using it gauge the total amount of the penalties.
There is definitely a trend in seeing higher penalties in enforcement cases than ever before and with few checks and balances in place, this is likely to continue.
For further information on this and other related subjects, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org or (619) 298-2880.
- Managing Partner and CEO
Michelle L. Jacko, Esq. is the Managing Partner and CEO of Jacko Law Group, PC, which offers securities, corporate, real estate and employment law counsel to broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies ...
Add a comment
- New SEC Climate Change and ESG Task Force to Enhance Investor Protection by Red Flagging Examples of Corporate Greenwashing
- What Investment Advisers Must do to Qualify for the DOL’s Prohibited Transaction Exemption for IRA Rollovers
- SEC Division of Examinations Cites Enhanced Focus on Business Continuity Processes, Protection of Retail Investors and ESG-Related Risks Among its 2021 Priorities
- FINRA Report Suggests Growing Need for Enhanced Risk Management in Cybersecurity and Outside Business Activities
- Deadline Approaching: Considerations for Your Form ADV
- Leveraging JLG's Latest Service: Real Estate
- Safeguarding Your Firm Against Fraudulent or Improper Recognition of Revenue
- New Advisers Act Advertising Rule to Undergo Further Review
- Investors, Advisers Must be Mindful to Comply with New U.S. Ban on Estimated $1 Trillion of Chinese Securities
- Your First Meeting on the SEC’s New Investment Adviser Marketing Rule Should Address These Topics
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Investment Advisers
- Regulatory Examinations
- Policies and Procedures
- Social Media Marketing
- Due Diligence
- Transition Services
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
- Aging Clients
- Advisers Act
- Virtual Currency
- Dodd-Frank Act
- Ponzi Scheme
- Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE)
- Broker Protocol
- Securities Law
- Form U5
- Private Equity
- Private Funds
- Hedge Funds
- Regulation Best Interest
- Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
- Government Shutdown
- Risk Alert
- Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- Investment Company Act
- Rule 6c
- Wells Fargo