Jacko Law Group, PC
Call Today for a Consultation
San Diego 619-298-2880 San Francisco 415-766-3599 Los Angeles 213-631-2549

Federal Court Rules: Some Virtual Currencies Are Commodities and Subject to Regulation

bitcoin 2.jpg

Digital and virtual currencies continue to be a growing trend in the financial industry. Investors are demonstrating increased interest and trading activity, and, more and more financial advisers are considering inclusion of cryptocurrencies in investment portfolios.

Existing as digital representations of currency that can be exchanged for goods and services, their lack of clearly defined status as securities or commodities (or something else) has placed them in unclear waters without a regulatory body holding oversight authority. The regulators have arrived a bit late to the digital currency and are making efforts to determine how to regulate these virtual, non-traditional products.

This increased interest and demand, accompanied by uncertainty concerning the regulatory status of the cryptocurrencies, has created an opportunity for dishonest individuals to take advantage of this new and still poorly regulated market.

Are Cryptocurrencies Considered to be Securities?

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has maintained that many virtual currencies actually meet the definition of securities or commodities and that they should be subject to the registration and other requirements of federal securities regulations in order to be offered for sale.

Learn about the unclear status of virtual currencies in the trading arena here.

Both the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have sought to determine which virtual currencies meet the standards of a "security" or "commodity" in order to better regulate the market and prevent fraudulent trading activities.

Court Rules Digital Currency is Commodity, CFTC Has Regulatory Power to Prosecute

In a September 26, 2018, ruling, the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts ruled that the CFTC has the power to regulate and prosecute fraudulent activities involving virtual currencies that meet the definition of securities, including the defendants of the My Big Coin case.

In this case, the CFTC has alleged that My Big Coin solicited retail customers using repeated false claims related to the digital currency's:

● Value

● Usage

● Trade status

● Financial backing

In the case, the court denied the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, which claimed that the CFTC's anti-fraud authority extended only to fraudulent market manipulation. The court ruled that My Big Coin was a commodity based, in part, on the "broad language in the statute" "explicitly prohibit[s] fraud even in the absence of market manipulation."

The CFTC is seeking civil monetary penalties, restitution, rescission, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, trading and registration bans, and permanent injunctions against further violations of the federal commodities laws, as charged.

Further details are available in the CFTC's October 3, 2018, press release.

Cryptocurrency Trading - What the Ruling Means

This ruling clearly states that the My Big Coin product is a commodity, and that the CFTC has authority to prosecute this, and thereby other, fraud in virtual currencies as it can with other commodities.

"This ruling, like the one in McDonnell from Judge Weinstein in the Eastern District of New York, recognizes the broad definition of commodity under the Commodities Exchange Act, and also that the CFTC has the power to prosecute fraud with respect to commodities, including virtual currencies. We will continue to police these markets in close coordination with our sister agencies," said James McDonald, CFTC Director of Enforcement.

Suffice it to say that virtual currencies and the (sometimes questionable) trading activity their popularity and potential profitability have generated are attracting the attention of regulatory bodies.

Greater Attention to Due Diligence Necessary

Prior to recommending that clients invest in cryptocurrencies, due diligence must be performed to assess the status of the virtual currency as a security or commodity and the regulations that would apply (in addition to the standard due diligence about the quality of the investment, of course).

Failure to perform such due diligence could result in significant financial loss, regulatory scrutiny, an enforcement action against the adviser, or all of the above, as the regulatory bodies continue their attempts to better define how virtual currencies fit into the regulatory landscape.

For more information on the trading of virtual currencies, or any other related legal questions, contact Jacko Law Group, PC. Let our experience work for you.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

How Can We Help?

Email us to request more information or to schedule an appointment.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

San Diego Office
1350 Columbia Street
Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92101

Toll Free: 866-497-2298
Phone: 213-631-2549
Phone: 619-298-2880
Fax: 619-298-2882
Map & Directions

San Francisco Office
Four Embarcadero Center
Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94111

Phone: 213-631-2549
Phone: 415-766-3599
Fax: 619-298-2882
Map & Directions

Los Angeles Office
535 N. Brand Boulevard
Suite 270
Glendale, CA 91203

Phone: 213-631-2549
Fax: 619-298-2882
Map & Directions